It's our business to know!

  • The Management Briefing is aimed at the top echelon of a company or organisation.
  • It identifies on a regular basis the issues and trends on the socio-political and security levels in Southern Africa of that specific month and their potential implications. These are issues and trends people on the executive level ought to take notice of.

Arguing the unthinkable: negotiating a new dispensation (Part 3)

§  The year 2010 is a kind of watershed for South Africa. The election in April 2009 went very well, but by 2010 society at large is in a state of suppressed anxiety and unrest. Structures of society are falling apart and no-one seems to care or is able to do anything about it – apart from the odd government statement.

 

§  The run up from 2010 to 2020 demands some radical new thinking. Existing arguments and concepts no longer provide any meaningful answers to the challenges created by a new environment.

 

§  This paper is an exercise in the formulation of new thinking and concepts – and it will definitely not be the last! The emphasis will be on new arguments – arguing the unthinkable – in order to outline the environment in which people will have to operate. The supporting facts will be available to the reader in part 1 and 2 and other previous issues of Management Briefing – available from Intersearch (insearch@mweb.co.za).

 

If the information and conclusions in part 3 are correct, how will it impact on society (government and private sector) and can it still be managed? To be addressed in part 4).

 

 

§  Some of the information is not very comforting and may be considered by the reader as somewhat offensive. For that we apologize. However, in a way the reader has to be introduced to the South Africa of the 21st century. To a new reality that has to be faced. Whether it is popular or not, is irrelevant.

 

§  Sometimes information can be so unnerving that people tend to ignore it. Therefore, dealing with it in a rather disturbing and provocative way is the only option to by-pass social apathy and political correctness. It is information the lecturer in political science will not easily tell the students; legal experts refuse dealing with it, for it falls outside the constitution and financial institutions have somehow never incorporated it into their economic forecasts. It is information that has been continuously reported in the media, but with an information overflow of new facts every morning, people tend to read it, but do not understand!

 

Many people, who live in South Africa and pretend to understand the situation, know in fact very little about the country.

Commercial Agriculture: farming for the future!


  • The future of commercial agriculture is inextricably linked to the issue of “land reform”. According to available information, South Africa has 122 million ha of land, of which 100 million ha is considered agricultural land and of which 82 million ha used to be in white possession. The goal of land reform is to have 30% of farm land in black hands by 2014. In accordance with the objective of 30%, some 24 million ha of land will have to be transferred to previously disadvantaged people by 2014.


  • By 2009 the success of the land reform policy is under serious scrutiny. Government and commercial agriculture have been at loggerheads since 1994. Government wanted a process of an “accelerated transfer of land” and commercial farmers did everything to defend their land rights. President Zuma recently indicated that he would prefer a new and more practical arrangement for the very often difficult settling of land issues by the willing-buyer and willing-seller arrangement. His newly appointed minister and deputy minister of agriculture have largely been well received in the community of commercial farming.


  • New faces, a new attitude and old policies. What are the options for success? A new situation demands new thinking and new concepts. The solution to the “land reform problem” is more complicated than anticipated. The problem has become multi-dimensional and a single policy regarding the transfer of land indicates no solution.